ÐÂÊéÍÆ½é£º¡¶ÓïÒåÍø¼¼ÊõÌåϵ¡·
×÷ÕߣºöÄÔ£ÖÒ£¬ºú࣬³Ì¹¨
   XMLÂÛ̳     W3CHINA.ORGÌÖÂÛÇø     ¼ÆËã»ú¿ÆÑ§ÂÛ̳     SOAChinaÂÛ̳     Blog     ¿ª·Å·­Òë¼Æ»®     ÐÂÀË΢²©  
 
  • Ê×Ò³
  • µÇ¼
  • ×¢²á
  • Èí¼þÏÂÔØ
  • ×ÊÁÏÏÂÔØ
  • ºËÐijÉÔ±
  • °ïÖú
  •   Add to Google

    >> ±¾°æÌÖÂÛSemantic Web(ÓïÒåWeb,ÓïÒåÍø»òÓïÒåÍòÎ¬Íø, Web 3.0)¼°Ïà¹ØÀíÂÛ£¬È磺Ontology(±¾Ìå,±¾ÌåÂÛ), OWL(Web Ontology Langauge,Web±¾ÌåÓïÑÔ), Description Logic(DL, ÃèÊöÂß¼­),RDFa,Ontology EngineeringµÈ¡£
    [·µ»Ø] ÖÐÎÄXMLÂÛ̳ - רҵµÄXML¼¼ÊõÌÖÂÛÇø ¡ú W3CHINA.ORGÌÖÂÛÇø - Webм¼ÊõÌÖÂÛ ¡ú ¡º Semantic Web(ÓïÒåWeb)/ÃèÊöÂß¼­/±¾Ìå ¡» ¡ú Soft Semantic Web Services Agent¡¾Ò»ÆªÂÛÎÄ¡¿ ¡ó²é¿´ÐÂÌû ¡ó Óû§ÁÐ±í ¡ó

      ·¢±íÒ»¸öÐÂÖ÷Ìâ  ·¢±íÒ»¸öÐÂͶƱ  »Ø¸´Ö÷Ìâ  (¶©Ôı¾°æ) ÄúÊDZ¾ÌûµÄµÚ 2091 ¸öÔĶÁÕߣ £ ä¯ÀÀÉÏһƪÖ÷Ìâ  Ë¢Ð±¾Ö÷Ìâ   Ê÷ÐÎÏÔʾÌù×Ó¡¡ä¯ÀÀÏÂһƪÖ÷Ìâ
     * Ìù×ÓÖ÷Ì⣺ Soft Semantic Web Services Agent¡¾Ò»ÆªÂÛÎÄ¡¿ ¾Ù±¨  ´òÓ¡  ÍÆ¼ö  IEÊղؼР
       ±¾Ö÷ÌâÀà±ð:     
     maoxl ˧¸çÓ´£¬ÀëÏߣ¬ÓÐÈËÕÒÎÒÂð£¿
      
      
      µÈ¼¶£º´ó¶þ(Ñо¿»ã±à)
      ÎÄÕ£º20
      »ý·Ö£º294
      ÃÅÅÉ£ºXML.ORG.CN
      ×¢²á£º2006/3/26

    ÐÕÃû£º(ÎÞȨ²é¿´)
    ³ÇÊУº(ÎÞȨ²é¿´)
    ԺУ£º(ÎÞȨ²é¿´)
    ¸ømaoxl·¢ËÍÒ»¸ö¶ÌÏûÏ¢ °Ñmaoxl¼ÓÈëºÃÓÑ ²é¿´maoxlµÄ¸öÈË×ÊÁÏ ËÑË÷maoxlÔÚ¡º Semantic Web(ÓïÒåWeb)/ÃèÊöÂß¼­/±¾Ìå ¡»µÄËùÓÐÌù×Ó ÒýÓûظ´Õâ¸öÌù×Ó »Ø¸´Õâ¸öÌù×Ó ²é¿´maoxlµÄ²©¿ÍÂ¥Ö÷
    ·¢ÌùÐÄÇé Soft Semantic Web Services Agent¡¾Ò»ÆªÂÛÎÄ¡¿

    Absfracf - Web services play an active role in the business
    integration and other fields such as bioinformatics. Current Web
    services technologies such as WSDL, UDDI, BPEL4WS and
    BSML are not semantic-oriented. Several proposals have been
    proposed to develop Semantic Web services to facilitate the
    discovery of relevant Web services [1][8]. In our vision, with the
    mature of Semantic Web services technologies, there will be a lot
    of public or private Semantic Web services Registries based on
    specific ontologies. These Registries may provide a lot of similar
    Web services. So bow to provide the high quality of service (QoS)
    Semantic Web services for specific domain using these Registries
    will be a challenge task. Different domains have different
    requirements of QoS, it is impractical to use classical
    mathematical modeling methods to evaluate the QoS of Semantic
    Web services. In this paper, we propose a framework called Soft
    Semantic Web services Agent (SSWSA) for providing high QoS
    Semantic Web services using soft computing methodology. And
    we will use fuzzy neural network with CA learning algorithm as
    our study case. Simulation result shows that the SSWSA could
    handle fuzzy and uncertain QoS metrics effectively.
    I. INTRODUCTION
    Web services are playing more and more important role in
    e-business application integration and other fields such as
    bioinformatics. So it is crucial to provide and invoke the high
    quality of service (QoS) Web services for the success of both
    service providers and service consumers. Unfortunately,
    current Web services technologies such as WSDL, UDDI,
    ebXML, XLANG, WSFL, BPEL4WS and BSML are not
    semantic-oriented that means they do not provide semantic
    information-implicit semantics of service requestor and
    service designer about Web services during the publishing,
    discovery and invocation processes.
    Several projects are undergoing to try to add semantics to
    the Web services framework. DAML-S from DAML Services
    Coalition [I] uses DAML+OIL based ontology for describing
    Web services. The latest draft release [5] of DAML-S uses
    WSDL in conjunction with DAML-S for Web service
    description. METEOR-S from LSDIS Lab in the Computer
    Science Department of the University of Georgia [SI follows
    the approach to relate concepts in WSDL to DAML+OIL
    ontologies in Web service description and then provide an
    interface to UDDI that allows querying based on ontological
    concepts.
    In our vision, with the mature of Semantic Web services
    technologies, there will be a lot of public or private Registries
    for hosting and querying Semantic Web services based on
    specific ontologies. Just as today¡¯s situation, there are many
    public and private UDDI Registries hosting a lot of similar
    Web services with different QoS. For example, XEMBL, BQS
    and OmniGene. We think the QoS of Semantic Web services
    should cover both functional and non-functional properties.
    Functional properties include the input, output,
    conditionaloutput, precondition, accesscondition and effect of
    service. These functional properties can be characterized as
    the capability of the service [I]. Mon-functional properties
    include the availability, accessibility, integrity, performance,
    reliability, regulatoly, security, response time and cost.
    Several matchmaking schemes have been proposed to
    match the service requestor¡¯s requirement with service
    provider¡¯s advertisement [7][8][14[15]. Here we must be
    aware that on the one hand, the degree of capability matching
    and non-functional properties are all fuzzy and on the other
    hand, different, domains have different requirements on nonfunctional
    properties. It is difficult to use classical
    mathematical modeling methods to evaluate the whole QoS.
    Although there are several QoS models [3] existing, they are
    not suitable for the case in this paper.
    In this paper, we propose a fiamework called Soft
    Semantic Web services Agent (SSWSA) to provide the high
    QoS Semantic Web services based on specific ontology such
    as gnome. The SSWSA itself is Semantic Web sercice. The
    SSWSA comprises of six components: specific ontology
    based Semantic Web services Registries crawler
    (SOBSWSRC), specific ontology based Semantic Web
    services repositoly (SOBSWSR), specific ontology based
    Semantic Web services inquiry server (SOBSWSIS), specific
    ontology based Semantic Web services publish server
    (SOBSWSPS), soil Semantic Web services agent
    communication server (SSWSACS) and intelligent inference
    engine (LIE). The core of SSWSA is intelligent inference
    engine. It uses soil computing methodology to evaluate the
    whole QoS (both functional and non-functional properties) of
    Sematnic Web services. In this paper, we use several specific
    ontology based Semantic Web services for bioinformatics and
    fuzzy neural network with GA algorithm as our study to show
    the flexibility and reliability of soft computing methodology
    for handling fuzzy and uncertain linguistic information. For
    example, capability of service is fuzzy. It is unreasonable to
    use crisp value to describe it. So we can use several linguistic
    variables such as low or a little bit low and a little bit high or
    high to express the concept of capability of service.
    The paper is organized as follow. In section 11, we
    present the necessary background of Semantic Web services
    and soft computing methodology. Section 111 provides the
    details of architecture of the SSWSA. Section IV gives the
    design of fuzzy neural network with GA algorithm. Section V
    provides the simulation results. And fioally, in section VI, we
    conclude this paper and give the future direction.
    11. BACKGROUND
    In this section, we will give a brief overview of the
    background knowledge related to this paper.
    A. Semantic Web Services
    Currently, the Web is just a collection of documents
    which are human readable but not machine understandable. In
    order to remedy this disadvantage, the concept of Semantic
    Web is proposed to add semantics to the Web to facilitate the
    information fmdiog, extracting, representing, interpreting and
    maintaining. There are many Semantic Web technologies
    available today such as: RDF, RDFS, SHOE, DAML-ONT,
    OIL, DAML+OIL, DAML-L and OWL [13]. On the other
    hand, industry proposes the Web services to transform the
    Web from ¡°passive state¡± - repository of static documents to
    ¡°positive state¡± - repository of dynamic services.
    Unfortunately, the Web services standards such as WSDL,
    UDDI, XLANG, WSFL, ebXML and BPEL4WS are all not
    semantic-oriented. They are awkward for service discovery,
    invocation and composition [8]. So it is natural to combine the
    Semantic Web with Web services, the so-called Semantic
    Web services. Several projects have been initiated to design
    the framework for Semantic Web services such as DAML-S
    [I] and METEOR-S [8].
    B. Soft Computing Methodology
    According to Zadeh [I I] ¡°Soft computing differs from
    conventional (hard) computing in that, unlike hard
    computing, it is tolerant of imprecision, uncertainty, partial
    truth, and approximation.¡± The principal constituents of soft
    computing are fuzzy logic, neural networks and genetic
    algorithms. More and more technologies will join into the soft
    computing framework in near future. Fuzzy logic is primarily
    concerned with handling imprecision; neural computing
    focuses on simulating human being¡¯s learning process; genetic
    algorithms simulate the natural selection and evolutionary
    processes to do randomized global search. Each component of
    soft computing is complementary to each other. Using
    combination of several technologies such as fuzzy-neural
    system will generally get better solution.
    III. ARCHITECTURE OF SSWSA
    The Soft Semantic Web services Agent (SSWSA) can
    provide high QoS Semantic Web services based on specific
    ontology. SSWSA uses cenkdized dienuserver architecture.
    But itself can also be implemented as a Semantic Web service.
    The SSWSA comprises of six components: specific ontology
    based Semantic Web services Registries crawler
    (SOBSWSRC), specific ontology based Semantic Web
    services repository (SOBSWSR), specific ontology based
    Semantic Web services inquiry server (SOBSWSIS), specific
    ontology based semantic Web services publish server
    (SOBSWSPS), soft Semantic Web services agent
    communication server (SSWSACS) and intelligent inference
    engine (IIE). The high level architecture of SSWSA is shown
    in Figure 1.
    A. SOBSWSRC
    The specific ontology based Semantic Web services
    Registries crawler (SOBSWSRC) will access many public or
    private specific ontology based Semantic Web services
    Registries such as semantics-oriented UDDI for gnome to
    fetch the service profiles and store them in specific ontology
    based Semantic Web services Repository (SOBSWSR).
    B. SOBSWSR
    The specific ontology based Semantic Web services
    Repository (SOBSWSR) will store the service profiles which
    are fetched by SOBSWSRC and Semantic Web services
    which are published by services provider through the
    SOBSWSPS.
    C. SOBSWSRC
    The specific ontology based Semantic Web services
    Inquiry Server (SOBSWSIS) will provide two kinds of
    interfaces: one is the programmatic API to other agents;
    another is the human-readable. The SOBSWSIS transforms
    the service request profile into standard format and does
    matchmaking operation to calculate the capability of Semantic
    Web services stored in the SOBSWSR.
    D. SOBSWSPS
    The specific ontology based Semantic Web services
    Publish Server (SOBSWSPS) will provide the API for service
    providers to publish their specific ontology based Semantic
    Web services into the SOBSWSR.
    E. SSWSACS
    The soft Semantic Web services Agent Communication
    Server (SSWSACS) will use certain communication protocol
    such as KQML and SOAP to communicate with other
    SSWSAs. For example, if the SSWSA could not fmd the
    appropriate Semantic Web services requested by the service
    requesters, it will transfer the request to other SSWSAs
    through the SSWSACS.
    F. IIE
    The Intelligent Inference Engine (IIE) will use soft
    computing methodology to calculate the QoS of the Semantic
    Web services.
    IV. DESIGN OF FUZZY NEURAL NETWORK WITH GA
    ALGORITHM
    A schematic diagram of the four-layered fuzzy neural
    network (FNN) is shown in Figure 2. Nodes in layer one are
    input nodes representing input linguistic variables. Nodes in
    layer two are membership nodes. Each membership node is
    responsible for mapping an input linguistic variable into a
    possibility distribution for that variable. The rule nodes reside
    in layer three. The last layer contains the output variable
    nodes [4].
    Yt Y,
    4 4
    Layer 4
    (output layer)
    Layer 3
    (rule layer)
    Layer 1
    (membership
    layer)
    As we mentioned before, metrics of QoS of Semantic Web
    services are multidimensional. For illustration of specific
    ontology based Semantic Web services for bioinformatics, we
    decide to use capability, response time and trustworthiness as
    our inputs and QoS as output. The fuzzy logic system (FLS) is
    based on TSK model.
    A. Design of Fuzzy Input Sets
    Let x represent capability, y represent response time and z
    represent trustworthiness. We scale capability, response time
    and trustworthiness to [0, IO] respectively. The graphical
    representation s of membership functions of x, y, z are shown
    in Figure 3.
    4
    0 2 4 t 8 IO x, Y. z
    Fig. 3. Membership Functions of Inputs
    B. Design of Fuzzy Rule Base
    Here, we design the fuzzy rule base based on TSK model.
    Fuzzy rule is the form shown below:
    If x is 1, and y is I2 and z is I3 THEN
    0 is a,, * x + &> * y + aiz * z + &.+
    where 11, I2 and 1, in {low, middle, high], I in [I, 271.
    There are totally 27 fuzzy rules. The aij's are consequent
    parameters which will he obtained by training phase of FNN
    using GA algorithm.
    C. Design OfDefrrrrifier
    Suppose, for certain input x, y and z, there are m fuzzy
    rules fxed. To calculate firing strength of jth rule, we use
    below formula:
    (1)
    So the output is:
    wi = P h ) * PAY) * P M
    0 = &I ,... m W'*(q,l*x + q,2*Y + q,3*z + q.4) /(&=I ..... m wi)(2)
    D. Design of Genetic Algorithm
    GA is a model of machme learning which derives its
    behavior from a metaphor of the processes of evolution in
    nature. This is done by the creation within a machine of a
    population of individuals represented by chromosomes. Here
    we use real-coded scheme. Given the range of parameters
    (coefficients of linear equations in TSK model), the system
    uses the derivate-free random search-CA to leam to find the
    near optimal solution by the fitness function through the
    1)Chromosome: the genes of each chromosome are 81 real
    numbers (there are 81 parameters in fuzzy rule base) which
    are initially generated randomly in the given range. So
    each chromosome is a vectnr of 81 real numbers.Z)Fitnesss&ncfion: The fimess function is defme as
    3)Elitism: The tournament selection is used in the elitism
    process.
    4)Crossower: The system will randomly select the two
    parents among the population and then randomly select
    the number of cross points and simply exchanges the
    corresponding genes among these two parents to generate
    new generation.
    5)Mufafion: For each individual in the population, the system
    will randomly select the genes in the chromosome and
    replace them with randomly generated real number in the
    given range.
    E = l/ZEi=i, ...,,,, (dj - 03' (3)
    VI. SIMULATION
    There are two phases for applying fuzzy neural network
    (F"): training and predicting. In training phase, we use 168
    data entries as training data set. Each entry consists of three
    inputs and one expected output. We tune the performance of
    the system by adjusting number of population, generation and
    probability of crossover and mutation. Table I gives the part
    of prediction result with several parameters for output 0.
    TABLE I PREDICTION RESULT OF FNN.
    I 5.4
    In Table I, NO. OF GENERATION = 1000000, NO. OF
    POPULATION = 1000, PROBABILITY OF CROSSOVER =
    0.7, PROBABILITY OF MUTATION = 0.1. From the Table
    I, we could see the maximum error of training result is 1.6.
    The total prediction error for 168 entries is 25%. By our
    observation, designing reasonable fuzzy membership
    functions and choosing reasonable training data set which is
    based on specific application domain can reduce the
    prediction error a lot.
    VI. CONCLUSIONS
    In this paper, we discuss the design of Soil Semantic Web
    services Agent (SSWSA). The SSWSA could be used in
    World Wide Web (WWW), P2P and Grid intYastructure. The
    SSWSA is flexible and extensible. With the evolution of softcomputing, more and more technologies can be integrated into
    SSWSA. We use specific ontology based Semantic Web
    services for bioinformatics and fuzzy neural network with
    genetic algorithm as OUT study case. The trainiig time is short
    and training result is satisfactory. The SSWSA will retum the
    desired Semantic Web services based on the QoS of Semantic
    Web services. In the future, we will implement the SSWSA
    with the mature of Semantic Web services technologies, and
    apply it to semantic Web-based bioinformatics applications.
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
    The authors would like to appreciate the support by NIH
    under Grant P20 GM065762. We thank Dr. Harrison for his
    support and MI. Tang for his valuable suggestions.
    REFERENCES
    [I] A. Ankolekar, M. Burstein, J. Hobbs. etc. DAML-S: Web Senice
    Description for the Semantic Web The Fiml Intemalioml Semantic Web
    Conference (SWC), Sardinia (Italy), June. 2002.
    [2] A. Mani, and A. Magarajan Understanding quality of senice for Web
    senices. h t t p : / ~ - l 0 6 . i b m . c o m / d e v e l o p e M . o r k s / l i b h h l
    [2] A. Sheth, J. Cardoso, I. Miller and K. Kwhut QoS for Service-oriented
    Middleware Proceedings of the Conference on Ystemics, Cybemetics and
    In/omotics, Orlando, FL, July 2002 .
    [3] Ching-hung Lee, Jam-Lee Hong, Yuching Lin and Wei-yu Lai Type-2
    Fuzzy Neural Newark Systems and Leaning. Inremotional Journal of
    Computational Cognition Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 7 S 9 0 , December 2003.
    [SI DAML-S 0.7 Dratl Release h r m : / ~ . d o m l . o r e / s o i ~ ~ / d e m l - s / 0 . 7 /
    [6] Herve Abdi A Neural Newark Primer. Joumal U/ Biological System,
    Vol.2, No. 3, pp. 247-283, 1994
    [7] J. G o d c z -Castillo, D. Trastour, C. Bartolini Description Logics for
    Matchmaking of Services w?uwh~l.ho.com/rechreoorrs/2OOl/HPL-2OOl-
    &l.€L&
    [SI K. Sivashanmugam, K. Verma, A. Sheth and I. Miller Adding Semantics
    to Web Services Standards Intemafionol Conference on Web Ssnices (7CWS'
    03), 2003.
    [9] K. F. Man, K.S. Tang and S. Kwoog Genetic Algorithms: Concepts and
    Applications. IEEE Trmx On Industrial Electmnics, Vol. 43, No. 5, October
    1996.
    [IO] L.A. Zadeh The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to
    approximate reasoning-I, Inform. Sci. Vo1.8, pp. 19%249, 1975.
    [ I l l L.A. Zadeh Fuvy logic, neural networks, and soft computing.
    Communicalionr of the ACM, Vol. 37, pp. 11-84. 1994.
    [I21 M. Srinivas and Lalit M. Pamaik Genetic Algorithms: A Survey.
    Computer, Vol. 21, pp. 1 7 4 6 , 1994.
    [I31 S.A. Mcllmith, T.C. Son and H.L. Zeng Semantic Web service^ IEEE
    lnlellizent Svstems. S~ecinl Issue on the Semantic Web. 16(2):4653. ,,
    March/April,'2001.
    [I41 Sycara, K., Khuch, M., Widoff, S. and Lu, I. Dynamic Senicc
    Matchmaking Among Agents in Open Information Enviro&enfs. SIGMOD
    Record (ACMSIG on ManagemenlofDalo) Val. 28 No.1, pp47-53, 1999.
    [IS] T. R. Payne, M. Paolucci, KSycara Advertising and Matching DAML-S
    %Nice Descriptions hnp
    :/hvwwsemantioueb. o ~ g / s W i t i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ "

       Êղؠ  ·ÖÏí  
    ¶¥(0)
      




    µã»÷²é¿´Óû§À´Ô´¼°¹ÜÀí<br>·¢ÌùIP£º*.*.*.* 2006/5/9 13:42:00
     
     wolfel ˧¸çÓ´£¬ÀëÏߣ¬ÓÐÈËÕÒÎÒÂð£¿
      
      
      ÍþÍû£º2
      µÈ¼¶£º¼ÆËã»úѧʿѧλ
      ÎÄÕ£º280
      »ý·Ö£º2178
      ÃÅÅÉ£ºW3CHINA.ORG
      ×¢²á£º2005/3/17

    ÐÕÃû£º(ÎÞȨ²é¿´)
    ³ÇÊУº(ÎÞȨ²é¿´)
    ԺУ£º(ÎÞȨ²é¿´)
    ¸øwolfel·¢ËÍÒ»¸ö¶ÌÏûÏ¢ °Ñwolfel¼ÓÈëºÃÓÑ ²é¿´wolfelµÄ¸öÈË×ÊÁÏ ËÑË÷wolfelÔÚ¡º Semantic Web(ÓïÒåWeb)/ÃèÊöÂß¼­/±¾Ìå ¡»µÄËùÓÐÌù×Ó ÒýÓûظ´Õâ¸öÌù×Ó »Ø¸´Õâ¸öÌù×Ó ²é¿´wolfelµÄ²©¿ÍµÚ2Â¥
    ·¢ÌùÐÄÇé 
    ÕâÆªÎÄÕÂÊÇÄãдµÄô£¿ÎÒ¾õµÃʹÓÃÈí¼ÆËã·½·¨À´×öweb agent¿ÉÄܲ»»áÔÚ·ûºÅÖ÷ÒåÕâ¸öȦ×ÓÀïÃæ³ÔµÃ¿ª£¬¸öÈËÒâ¼û

    ----------------------------------------------
    Correct reasoning is our business.

    µã»÷²é¿´Óû§À´Ô´¼°¹ÜÀí<br>·¢ÌùIP£º*.*.*.* 2006/5/9 15:24:00
     
     GoogleAdSense
      
      
      µÈ¼¶£º´óÒ»ÐÂÉú
      ÎÄÕ£º1
      »ý·Ö£º50
      ÃÅÅÉ£ºÎÞÃÅÎÞÅÉ
      ÔºÐ££ºÎ´Ìîд
      ×¢²á£º2007-01-01
    ¸øGoogle AdSense·¢ËÍÒ»¸ö¶ÌÏûÏ¢ °ÑGoogle AdSense¼ÓÈëºÃÓÑ ²é¿´Google AdSenseµÄ¸öÈË×ÊÁÏ ËÑË÷Google AdSenseÔÚ¡º Semantic Web(ÓïÒåWeb)/ÃèÊöÂß¼­/±¾Ìå ¡»µÄËùÓÐÌù×Ó ·ÃÎÊGoogle AdSenseµÄÖ÷Ò³ ÒýÓûظ´Õâ¸öÌù×Ó »Ø¸´Õâ¸öÌù×Ó ²é¿´Google AdSenseµÄ²©¿Í¹ã¸æ
    2025/8/16 0:23:05

    ±¾Ö÷ÌâÌùÊý2£¬·ÖÒ³£º [1]

    ¹ÜÀíÑ¡Ï ÐÞ¸Ätag | Ëø¶¨ | ½âËø | ÌáÉý | ɾ³ý | ÒÆ¶¯ | ¹Ì¶¥ | ×̶ܹ¥ | ½±Àø | ³Í·£ | ·¢²¼¹«¸æ
    W3C Contributing Supporter! W 3 C h i n a ( since 2003 ) Æì Ï վ µã
    ËÕICP±¸05006046ºÅ¡¶È«¹úÈË´ó³£Î¯»á¹ØÓÚά»¤»¥ÁªÍø°²È«µÄ¾ö¶¨¡·¡¶¼ÆËã»úÐÅÏ¢ÍøÂç¹ú¼ÊÁªÍø°²È«±£»¤¹ÜÀí°ì·¨¡·
    156.006ms